HousingWeaver
FeaturesCase StudiesPlansBlog
HousingWeaver
  • Features
  • Case Studies
  • Plans
  • Blog
← Back to Blog

A Post-Pandemic Paradox: New Homes, Lower Prices

HousingWeaver Team·June 3, 2026

In one of the country's fastest-growing counties, a brand-new home costs less per square foot than a 30-year-old one. Understanding why reveals just how supply dynamics, financing, and land costs shape the housing market.

Wake County · 2024

The new-home discount, at a glance

Existing homes
$245/ sqft
New construction
$215/ sqft
↓−12% per square foot

Something strange is happening in housing. Across hot Sunbelt markets, brand-new homes are selling for less per square foot than their older neighbors. Wake County, NC — home to Raleigh and the Research Triangle — saw a 12% discount for new homes in 2024. Zillow Research found $200/sqft premiums for existing homes in some markets.

This defies conventional wisdom. Construction costs are sky-high. Buyers consistently prefer newer homes. So why is new construction trading at a discount?

Using historical sales data from HousingWeaver for Wake County — one of the fastest-growing counties in America and a microcosm of Sunbelt dynamics — we find three forces behind the paradox:

  1. Uneven impact on home prices. Builders ramped production significantly, cooling the relative new home premium — but not the price of existing homes.
  2. Interest rate shock & market segmentation. Soaring rates locked existing owners in place while giving well-capitalized builders the flexibility to discount and capture share.
  3. Location mismatch. New construction landed disproportionately in peripheral areas with fewer regulatory barriers — not the high-demand submarkets where price pressure is strongest.

Three forces behind the paradox

What the rest of this post unpacks

1Supply responded
+70%
permit growth

~17K homes/year permitted since 2021, up from a pre-pandemic ~10K baseline.

2Rates split the market
−200
sales/month per rate point

Owners locked into 3% mortgages stayed put; builders held the discounting flexibility.

3Location mismatch
6.8%
of new units in top price quintile

New construction landed in cheaper, peripheral submarkets — not where prices ran hottest.

Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver

Read on for the evidence behind each.

The Premium Turned Discount

The new home price premium isn't static. As the chart below shows, it declined steadily from 1990, neared zero during the early-2000s recession, and climbed again post–Great Recession.

Figure 1: New vs. Existing Home Price Premium (%) Per Square Foot
1990–2024
Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver

Then the pandemic hit — and the premium didn't just decline. It cratered. By 2024, new homes were selling at a 12% discount on a per-square-foot basis, even as the median Wake County home value hit $475,000 — up 51% from pre-pandemic levels.

Figure 5: Average Price Per Square Foot
Wake County, 1990–2024
Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver

The average home got dramatically more expensive. New homes somehow got cheaper relative to existing ones. Why?

Hypothesis 1: Supply Responds — But Only Partially

The simplest explanation: supply caught up with demand. Wake County permitted roughly 17,000 homes per year since 2021, up from a pre-pandemic average of 10,000. More supply cools the relative premium for new builds.

Figure 2: New Home Premium vs. Annual New Builds
1990–2024
Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver

As new construction surged post-pandemic, the price premium plummeted. The market is working — sort of. If increased supply were fully solving the imbalance, overall prices should moderate. Instead, they kept climbing.

Builders closed the relative price gap. They haven't touched the fundamental pressure driving prices higher.

Figure 3: New Home Premium (%) vs. New Builds
Scatter, 1990–2024
Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver
Figure 4: Lag Cross-Correlation
Cross-correlation between new home premium and annual new builds

Negative lag (left half): if the price premium changes today, what happens to construction in future years? Strong negative values (down to −0.7) mean a higher premium today correlates with more building several years later — builders respond to profit signals, but it takes time.

Positive lag (right half): if construction increases today, what happens to the price premium in future years? Moderate negative values (−0.2 to −0.3) show that more building today tends to lower the premium in subsequent years, but the effect is weaker than the signal going the other direction.

Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver

Hypothesis 2: The Great Rate Divide — Builder Flexibility vs. Owner Lock-In

Interest rates reshaped the housing market. In Wake County, for every percentage point rates climbed, roughly 200 fewer homes sold per month. Financing a $500,000 home jumped from ~$2,200/month in 2021 to ~$3,200/month today.

Figure 6: Monthly Home Sales (Seasonally Adjusted) vs. Average Mortgage Rate
March 2018 – February 2025 · Correlation (r): -0.90
Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver; Freddie Mac PMMS
Figure 7: Normalized Housing Market Indicators
March 2018 – February 2025
Listings (SA, Normalized)
Listings begin to fall along with the start of COVID.
Sales (SA, Normalized)
Sales begin to fall after a peak in November 2021.
Price (ZHVI, Normalized)
Prices peak but remain stubbornly high.
Price Change (Normalized)
Price-increase rate peaks and then falls rapidly.
Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver; Zillow (ZHVI)

As rates spiked in 2022, listings cratered and stayed low. Why? The lock-in effect. Existing homeowners with 3% mortgages looked at 7% rates and stayed put, drastically reducing resale supply.

Builders faced no such constraint — and they had financial cushion. National homebuilder gross margins climbed from ~21% pre-pandemic to nearly 29% at their 2022 peak, allowing them to offer aggressive rate buydowns, price cuts, and incentives that individual homeowners couldn't match. Builders jumped from ~25% of Wake County sales pre-pandemic to 36% post-pandemic.

Figure 8: Builder Profit Margins vs. Mortgage Rates
2017 Q1 – 2024 Q4
Source: Freddie Mac PMMS; HousingWeaver analysis of top 8 publicly-listed builders' quarterly earnings

Rate dynamics gave builders the flexibility to undercut existing homeowners. But they don't explain where the discount runs deepest.

Hypothesis 3: Location, Location, Limitation

The real unlock is geography. Wake County built ~17,000 units per year — but where those units landed matters enormously.

Pre-pandemic, demand concentrated in the pricier northwest-central corridor. That's where you'd expect builders to follow. But that's not what happened.

Only 6.8% of new homes were built in the top price quintile. The two lowest price quintiles captured the most new construction — 18.7% and 18.8%, respectively. Builders went where land was cheaper and regulatory hurdles were lower.

Figure 11: Share of New Homes Built (2019–2024) by 2019 ZIP Price Quintile
Wake County, NC
Source: Wake County Housing Transaction Data, HousingWeaver

New homes appear cheaper on average partly because they're disproportionately in cheaper locations. Existing homes in high-demand areas face less competition from new builds nearby and benefit from scarcity and the lock-in effect. New construction, concentrated in lower-priced areas and sold with builder incentives, pulls the average new home price down.

Land costs, zoning, and infrastructure push builders to the periphery — and that geography gap explains much of the apparent discount.

Conclusion

Wake County's story isn't unique. The same three forces are playing out across Sunbelt metros wherever land is constrained, rates remain elevated, and builders have outmaneuvered a frozen resale market. As rates eventually ease and the lock-in effect loosens, the discount will likely narrow. But the location mismatch is structural, not cyclical, and won't resolve on its own. Land use restrictions are preventing new construction from pushing prices down where demand is highest. Builders aren't avoiding high-demand submarkets by choice — they're locked out by zoning.

For planners and policymakers, the solution is clear: allow soft-density housing in high-demand corridors. The discount paradox will persist until new construction is permitted to go where the market needs it most.

What's happening in your market? Explore how HousingWeaver can help turn local housing data into actionable insight.

HousingWeaver

Housing analytics for government agencies and housing professionals.

HR&A Advisors

Product

  • Features
  • Plans
  • Housing Assessments
  • Live Demo

Questions

  • Housing Shortage
  • Who’s Being Priced Out
  • Building Enough
  • Policy Impact

Company

  • About HR&A
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026HousingWeaver by HR&A Advisors. All rights reserved.

Sign InGet Started
Sign InGet Started